Friday, October 06, 2006

FIDEL: FANATIC, FAKER - OR FOREVER ?

The Stocken (CA) Record - Vintage section

(Published Tuesday, Oct 3, 2006)

'Fanatic or Faker, Fidel has Lung Power."

That was the headline on the Sept. 10, 1960, Los Angeles Mirror story I wrote after listening and watching Fidel Castro, dictator of Cuba, rave on for 41/2 hours on the rostrum of the U.N. General Assembly.I

t was an awesome meeting of world leaders.Adding to the spectacle, Castro's words came over my headphones from the voice of a female U.N. interpreter. With four years of Spanish classes from my high school and college days, I frequently took off the headphones to watch Fidel rant on in his native language.Nearly half a century later as I write this, Castro is recovering from surgery after a near-death illness.

Today, while most democracies still regard him as a fanatic, "faker" might better be translated as an effective political performer. His 47-year tenure, uninterrupted until now, apparently exceeds most heads of state except for the reigns of England's queen and Thailand's king.

But on that U.N. rostrum, "the bearded revolutionary took on the aspect of a man who is convinced he has sole access to truth," I reported."There are no shades of gray in his world. The United States is the devil, the Soviet Union is the great father."

And on the floor of delegates was his father figure, Nikita Khrushchev, beaming on his boy and cueing his comrades when to applaud, when to stop applauding, when to rise for an ovation and when to sit down.

Oddly, for the first 25 minutes, Castro complained about his hotel accommodations in Harlem and the envelope of security that surrounded him. I agreed. I had tried unsuccessfully to reach his room in the Theresa, often dubbed the Waldorf of Harlem.While other reporters tried the elevator, I struggled up the stairs one floor short of Castro's room before being halted by his security guards. I didn't get to confirm the rumor that Castro's aides had brought live chickens into the food pantry.

Protesters, shouting on the streets below, not only talked with me, but at one stage proposed mysteriously to take me along with the expatriates sneaking back into Cuba, trying to overthrow the regime. I wasn't about to do that, but I submitted to being blindfolded for a trip to their "hangout."

Thank you, I didn't want to be embedded in a regime-change effort.

Castro's dodging of the mainstream press contrasted with Khrushchev's welcome to us outside the Soviet consulate, where he was staying. It reminded me of the train ride to San Francisco from Los Angeles that many of us had made a year earlier after Khruschev had been rebuffed by Los Angeles' then-Mayor Norris Poulson and police Chief William H. Parker's refusal to provide security so he could go to Disneyland.

While the U.S. had recognized the Soviet Union and China as nations, its refusal to offer the same to communist Cuba leaves doubt whether old Fidel will live to see that day.

Contact Paul Weeks at rand9999@aol.com

Friday, September 29, 2006

Return to L.A.'s Skid Row -After 51 Years

The sun beat down on the Los Angeles Police Department’s smartly new, uniformed 50-officer Skid Row troopers last Sunday. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was proclaiming a new era of “urban reform” for the bleak streets and sidewalks that have harbored the downtrodden, the hopeless, the drug addicts and alcoholics for generations.

At 85, I sat on a folding chair graciously offered me behind the police lines down the street from the ceremonies because my police press pass had expired almost a half a century after I last roamed the streets of Skid Row.

In 1955, Virgil Pinkley, the publisher and editor of the Los Angeles Mirror News, then an afternoon paper owned by the Los Angeles Times, assigned Vernon McPherson and me to spend three months to prepare a 10-part series “exposing” the rot on Skid Row. Ironically, the occasion Sunday reminded me of President George W. Bush’s triumphant appearance aboard an aircraft carrier off San Diego on May 1, 2003, proclaiming victory in the war on Iraq – the war which is still raging and with no ending in sight.

At early dawn, before Sunday’s proceeding, Ernest Savage, who is producing a television documentary that deals in part with the problems of poverty in the city, took me on the tour that opened my eyes again to what I had seen 51 years ago.

There was modernization. Some denizens dwelt in little tents, but others still curled up in cardboard boxes or slept in doorways or out in the open sidewalks. The streets were littered with trash.

“Are they always like this?” I asked Savage.

“No, the City sweeps them clean regularly, but they look like this again the next day,” he said.
Spanking new “lofts” loom above some of the streets. Some of the old hotels have been “gentrified,” I was told, reserving the top stories for higher rent-paying customers, gradually removing some of the poorer from the lower levels.

A gray-haired woman, who identified herself only as “Goodluck Lady,” shuffled by, burdened down by what probably were all of her belongings. “I had to move when I could no longer pay the rent,” she said. “They gave me some money. It won’t keep me for long.”

“You appear to be in good health" I smiled.

She smiled back. “I’ve always been a vegetarian. I don’t smoke. I’ve never been married . . .”
But she had been on the Row. She had no family. She had nowhere else to go.

Savage and I went to breakfast at a sparkling, gleaming Starbucks Coffee Shop, edging the Row. As we drove into the parking lot, a black man rushed up and began swabbing the windshield to clear the dust. He didn’t stop to ask if we wanted the service, but kept on going, mopping all the windows.

Savage was delighted because he had planned to go to a car wash so his cameraman could shoot through the windows to catch the action before anyone was aware they were being photographed.

The window washer, seeing the camera grind, kept right on washing, but answered our questions readily. He was more than willing to go on record. He wasn’t new on the Row. He had tried for years to escape into better opportunities. But with no luck.

“I get $212 monthly from welfare,” he said. “That’s supposed to cover rent, food and all the necessities, but it doesn’t nowadays.” He didn’t sound complaining. He was just telling the facts.
Savage told me that Police Chief William J. Bratton had won recognition when he headed New York’s police force, beginning was cleaning out the “windshield washers” who plagued drivers in the city.

Our man listened but said, “It won’t make no difference. I’ll be right back here washin’ windows. Where else can I go?”

The television producer had lured me back to the Row after he had reproduced in print our full series from six decades past. I spent hours after midnight the day we went back, reading what The Mirror had published.

The series began by explaining that our editor had become well aware of the blot on the downtown area, mostly between 2nd and 9th Streets and Central Avenue and Main. We had been invited to accompany a wealthy hotel owner and property developer, Ben Weingart, into the area:

“We were in the front seat of a black Cadillac,” we began, “watching one of the wealthiest men in California warp it into a parking place near 5th and Crocker Sts.

“A wreck of a man lurched off the sidewalk. His hand caught on the fender.

“He leaned and bent over.

“And then he retched . . . and retched.

“Other derelicts weaved past unheeding. Our multimillionaire driver paid no attention to either. He knew the code of the street – you don’t stare at, or stoop to help and man who is throwing up.”

The number of “residents,” if you could call them that, was about 15,000.

“A ring of decay,” as Gilbert E. Morris, then head of the Department of Building and Safety” described it, “is spreading fast. There are infections at 3rd and Hill, Pico and Figueroa, on Temple St. and elsewhere.

“If humanitarian appeals are not heeded, perhaps the taxpayer will listen when he finds out how much it costs him to operate a slum, to pay for its police, fire, health and safety protection.”

We wrote that, “You who live on Los Feliz or Sherman Oaks, or in some other tidy section, go there as a tourist would to the Casbah, to Pigalle, or the Bowery. The drunks and the derelicts, the petty hoodlums and the prostitutes are color and atmosphere.

“You go to Skid Row to go slumming. You are flirting with danger. Be honest. In a way it somehow has an aura of tawdry glamour. A community with civic pride exerts pressure on its government to keep itself clean and decent and law-abiding. You draw the line at Skid Row. This is not YOUR town.”

Back to the Row today: The population had changed from a majority of whites, where 50 years ago it was mostly male alcoholics. In 1954, police had made 45,000 arrests, mostly for public intoxication. Today the population is mostly African-American and Latino. Peddlers of any sort of illegal drug descend on the streets every night.

In the morning, we found a man and his wife, sitting in the heat, outside their little tent.. “She’s been straight for a year,” her husband said. “But the temptation is always there. It is all around us all the time.”

“Why can’t you move away?”

“I’m a highly-qualified cook,” he said, “but I have arthritis so bad I can’t stand up long. I can’t get no work.” His wife sat on the curb, smoking a cigarette. A woman walked by, snatched the cigarette. The wife calmly retrieved it. No scuffle.

Riding back on the train that night to my home ion Oceanside, the events of the day drowned out any other thought.

Reform Skid Row? You may recycle the denizens from the streets to the jails, but they will be back. They have nowhere else to go. It is the only home of desperate people. Change will not occur until mental health treatment and psychological encouragement is accorded by a society that still bears the cost of the “city of decay,” worse than it was 50 years ago.

Eliminating Skid Row would only scatter the homeless like the spray of an explosion, placing them anonymously, still helpless, throughout the community.
###

Ralph Story: 1920-2006

Ralph Story, the veteran radio and television personality best known for his wry and witty observations about life in Los Angeles, died Tuesday at his home in Santa Ynez after a long battle with emphysema. He was 86."
(Lead on J. Michael Kennedy's obituary for Ralph Story
in the L.A. Times on Sept. 27, 2006.)

Remembering Ralph Story. . .

By Paul Weeks

He was the best newsman and story-teller of them all in Los Angeles. He was a good friend, but didn't let that get in his way when a TV appearance he wanted me to arrange for him went awry. It was this way:

When Richard Nixon was elected, I knew it was time for me to resign from my job with the government's "War on Poverty" in San Francisco and go home to L.A. Ralph was among my contacts and said he'd try to help.

Come 1971, I was handling the public information job at the RAND Corporation when Dan Ellsberg's leak of the "Pentagon Papers" -- taken from RAND's top-classified files -- broke in the New York Times. I had always secretly admired what Dan had done, but found myself in the midst of a disaster for RAND.

Ralph called. "Will you get me someone from RAND for my morning show tomorrow to talk about it?"

"Sorry, Ralph," I said, swinging into my p.r. spin, "Dan is a fugitive from justice and it wouldn't be proper for us to talk about it at this time."

I'm sure he expected that and laughed. "Well, what can. . ."

I probably broke in about then and thought, hmmm, maybe I can find someone high in the management to talk -- not about Ellsberg, but what RAND is and what it does.

"I can get you reports that Ellsberg wrote at RAND that are unclassified. But suppose I can get you one of our people to explain what we do -- both in defense and domestic research?"

Undoubtedly, Ralph thought that would be a good idea to get his oar in on the story
. . . would answer his questions and at least get a "we-can't-comment-on-that" from his guest.

Gus Shubert, our vice-president who was a splendid overseer of my office among his other duties, agreed. Great. Arrangements were completed for him to go to the studio.

Morning arrived. Time for Gus to get along. My phone rang.

"Harry wants to speak with you." It was the secretary to RAND's president, Harry Rowen."
(We called them secretaries then. Now they are "assistants.")

I trembled. I think I knew what was coming.

"Cancel that thing right now!" he ordered. "We won't have Gus going down there!"

"But," I sputtered, "we've already agreed to Gus' appearing. Story's going to have five minutes of time to fill!"

"CANCEL IT!"

I did.

Jack Vogel, my immediate supervisor as head of the publications department, heard my sad story. Story wouldn't be sad. . .He would be mad as HELL! Jack didn't hesitate.

"We'll tape record it," he said. Brilliant idea. We did.

You should have heard Ralph spout: "Who are these people who hide what they're doing with taxpayers' money?" or words to that effect. "They exist on government contracts. What's so mysterious about them?"

Oh, didn't he lay it on to us. . . snubbing the media . . . high fallutin' research scientists who won't talk to the people. Five full minutes of it. Well, maybe I don't remember a break or two to champion Wheaties or Firestone Tires.

"Paul," Jack Vogel said, "we'll take it down to the management's morning committee meeting. You come with me."

"OK, Jack, but. . ."

"We will play the whole thing for them."

We did.

Silence. Then a snigger or two. Silence.

It was my turn to get mad. I started to fire away at all of them.

"Gentlemen," (I don't remember any ladies present in those days), you've answered up to now to the Defense Department, a few Congressional committees, and . . ." (I don't know if there was anyone else on the list). "And now you're going to answer to everyone from Peoria to Timbuktu." Yes, I remember saying Timbuktu, but I guess Timbuktu didn't care what the hell RAND did.

I sat down. Well, I said to myself, you've talked your way out of another job. I'd get fired. I learned over the next 19 years or so that RAND doesn't settle its internal problems that way. Everyone got a chance to blow his or her top once in awhile.

Harry Rowen had always called me Paul. RAND likes the idea of everyone calling each other by their first names, no matter how high or how low they are on the ladder.

Harry Rowen rose. He turned to me. He took a deep breath.

"Well, Mr. Weeks, we will continue doing it MY WAY!"

By golly, we didn't. I never had so much satisfaction over the next couple of decades proving to this high-touted think tank that you have to keep the door wide open to the press. Tell them what you do. Give the public an accounting of what you do, just as you do to your sponsors.

Harry Rowen was a brilliant scientist himself. He had to take much of the rap for what had happened. Ellsberg had been a close friend. Ellsberg, out of conscience, betrayed him and RAND. But Dan told the truth about the terribly botched war in Vietnam. I have told him that.

Ralph, I owe you much gratitude because it was you who gave a very important institution in the shaping of governmental response to heavy problems a lesson how it best serves its broad constituency.

Rest in peace.

Friday, August 04, 2006

"Don't leave home without me!"


Millie would prefer another way to express the ad man's view of "Don't leave home without it!" She demands that we take HER along whenever we leave home. The dog medical community has already labeled this, "Separation anxiety," and suggests many ways to deal with it.

Millie, a six-year-old German Shepherd-Laborador mix, let us know about it shortly after we adopted her from the Helen Woodward Animal Center last year. It was the night I took my spouse Barbara out for a birthday dinner.

Millie greeted us greedily -- with anxiety, yes -- when we got home. She had torn the dry wall out from the area next to the entrance to our garage from the laundry room. Plaster all over the place. Scratches on the door.

Born in the millennium year, which is why we nmed her Millie, we thought she ought to behave less "puppyly" at five. Don't they say that you multiply a dog's life by seven years to measure her maturity. My goodness. she should behave like a 35-year-old when we got her!

Once we thought the healing process was working after we began leaving her alone for three minutes, then five minutes, then -- at 20 minutes -- kerplunk! The door was torn asunder again.

Oh, we've been advised many ways to attain a cure: Put her in a cage when you leave home. Hmmm. Does imprisonment cure a human being unless he gets rehabilitation?

We didn't cage Millie. We gave her a prescriptive medicine that was supposed to ease anxiety. More than a year later we're still giving her the medicine.

In the meantime, she has chewed four seat belts asunder in our van on four separate occasions when we left her alone in the car. Toyota has benefited by up to $800. Millie hasn't chewed a seat belt since we began spraying ithem with a noxious substance.

I will welcome recommendations -- short of euthanasia -- from anyone who reads this.

Thursday, September 08, 2005

Expressing thanks -- belatedly

The dog days of August aren't ordinarily days of Thanksgiving and, as I approach 85, they seem decidedly tardy to do what I'd like to do today -- express my gratitude to many whom, besides my family, have given me inspiration and insight to wind along the merry path of life:

I can't help but start with my father. At the age of 12, I was having emergeny surgery in a Dickinson, N.D., hospital. Apparently, I was overdosed with anesthetic. The nuns who were nurses came running out, crying, "We need a priest." I don't know if he used any profanity in replying, but he suggested, "Just get another doctor in there!"

In grade school, Mabel Planer, from Brainerd, Minn., lent her skills to carrying me through junior high in Mott, N.D., with high grades and current encouragement. Why do we always wait until it's too late to get these messages to them?

In high school, Allen Williams, counselor for the Albuquerque High Record, coached me from my first appointment as sophomore reporter (I had to give up drumming in the band to take it), though sports editor up to editor in my senior year -- basic training for my long wished-for career in newspapering. And there was Gertrude McGowan, who liked my essay on, "Driving in the City -- the Land of Dented Fenders," that kicked my tender ego upstairs again.

Colleg professors at the University of New Mexico took it from there. Dudley Wynn, who had left a university position in the east to recover from tuberculosois in New Mexico's sun, taught English literature with special talent in portraying the beauty of poetry. But when the final examination came along, I had to write an essay on what I''d learned.

I filled an entire notebook with the glories of the English countryside, extolling the land from that produced its talent -- but very little of what I'd learned in his class. Wynn cracked that the writing was pretty good -- but it went around the purpose of the essay wonderfully. Thus, he inspired even as he set me straight on how beating around the bush usuallly doesn't produce results.

Compare that with another professor, a stuffed-shirt fellow teaching neo-classical English lieteerature. I had arrived at his classroom late -- as usual -- one morning. When I sat in a folded chair, it collapsed and shot straight up the aisle to his desk I got my first "F" grade at the end of six weeks. I protested with a unique apology. Since I was working my way through college as the sports editor of The Albuquerque Journal, I was often late in getting home at night and had little time to study.

His expression changed magnificently. I was a writer! My grades improved perceptively thereafter. Oh, what fools these mortals be!

Editor H. P. Pickrell, at The Journal, had given me a big boost when he hired me on to the paper after I had covered my high school graduation night for him. Sittingthere in my mortarboard hat, I took copious notes from the longest and dryest graduation night address you could imagine. I had my notes folded properly as I knew reporters did it, and eked out five or six paragaphs that got into print. That did it.

When I heard of the man, Heywood Broun, who organized the Newspaper Guild, another reporter from the opopositiosition paper and I put together a meeting for all reporters at the Franciscan Hotel for a Sunday when no one would be working. Unfortunately, the management of the two newspapers called a staff meeting at the newwspaper offices for the same hour.

Alas, only the two of us showed up to organize the Guild. When my editor heard about my involvement in it, it broke his heart after all he'd done for me. To make up for it, he gave me a raise -- from $5 a week to $10 -- and evening working hours so I could go to college in the fall.

He's the same editor who, eight years later, was again saddened when I was offered a job on the Los Angeles Daily News for $77.50 a week while I was only making $40 at The Journal. He offered to meet the Daily News figure. I thanked him but declined. The News had a Guild. I've been an advocate of unions ever since.

The Daily News was a newspaperman's newspaper. Phil Garrison, who had been my PR officer in the Air Corps, offered me the job in the summer of 1946. I had another offer to join a publicity firm in New York City. I compared the two. In New York, I would have made far more money first -- and died earlier from ulcers. That's the way I looked at it.

The News was exhiliarating. And Garrison was good to me, although he differed from my politics. "A Socialist," he said, "is a Communist with a wife and two children." That well described me, I suppose. Although I saw a line that divides Socialism from Communism whether I had a wife and two children or not.

In the fading days as the newspaper was headed for bankruptcy, I said it would be a "cold day in hell" before I would go to work for Norman Chandler at the L,A. Times - Mirror. It was the coldest day of December, 1944, when I signed up with The Mirror, Chandler's afternoon newspaper, and found another man to express gratitude here: Managing Editor Ed Murray, who ran such a a liberally-bent tab that the Chandlers finally let him go.

Murry had me covering visiting delegations from the Soviet Union so often that I enrolled in a Russian language class to assist in my work. I learned how to ask where the bathroom was and when dinner would be served, but the responses often came to me in Spanish instead of Russian.

Once I ran into him when a p.r. man for a Skid Row property owner wanted to give me $500 to keep his boss' name out of an exposè another reporter and I were writing. Murray only laughed at me and sent me back to work. The next day the p.r. man came back again and went into Murray's office.

Raging Ed hustled the guy alll the way out of the cityroom to the enjoyment of all of us.

Ed is in the same class as Frank McCulloch, my managing editor at the L.A. Times after The Mireror collapsed. Frank is the guy who came to me and said, "We've done a good job covering the racial turmoil in Mississipi and Alabama, but what are we doing in our own backyard?

Given the job, I enjoyed a season or two of introducing the black propulation and its poblems into the erstwhile lilly-white columns of the august Times. After McCulloch left, the next managing editor didn't have the same outlook on the story, and pulled me off of it. Put him on the same list as the prof who got excited when my chair slammed into his desk.

In retirement, tired of watching the grass grow, I got re-introduced into the hum of things when my granddaughter, Erin, writing a school essay, asked me why I became interessted in civil rights. That, plus excellent encouragment and medicine from the greatest primary medical doctor on the horizon, Bruce Covner, got me writing again. And, as you can see, I'm still at it, with the best editor in the neighborhood, my spouse, Barbara, who keeps my commas in the right place and my sensitivity sharpened to good taste -- but never able to keep me from going on passed the place that ought to be the finish line.

Covner has taken over where psychiatry never finished up, keeping me with my eye on the prize instead of on the hopelessness of everything. Politics, religion, philosophy, international relations, he's ready to join in past my allotted time for appointments, in my vciew. His alertness when health alarms start ringing, he hears before I do, and he has seen me through some skirmishes I would not have won without him.

This is a never-ending list of people whom I owe much to. But I don't want to forget the lady who failed to throw my newspaper against the door as I demanded that led to my return to writing a column. (See, "Why I Write for the Stockton Record," in a previous blog.)

And did I mention what a lovely editor I have lived with for the past 15 years? The best years I've had. Twilights go on and on, and that's a good thing.

Lincoln, Melancholy, Mortality

I’ve just read Joshua Wolf Shenk’s cover piece in The Atlantic for October 2005, “Lincoln’s Great Depression,” which tries to deal with Lincoln’s melancholy in terms of modern understandings of psychology, contending that the Great Emancipator’s legacy of successes in dealing the with critical issues facing the nation were directly derived from his way of dealing with depression.

The mysteries of manic/depression have always intrigued me because I, too, deal with such mood swings – never quite so disabling that I could accept self destruction as resolve. I could not let my love for those dependent upon me, and who count on my being around to resort to such resolution.

Was a belief in God a motivation for Lincoln to counter his melancholy with acts of nobility? Shenk touches on that, but not in much depth. "God" can be employed as a figure of speech in dealing with issues of responsibility for one’s existence, but it only provokes me to make a direct approach to it.

Do I believe in a God who presides over all of our thoughts and our actions? I think not. But I don’t dismiss it. Atheism is as much a belief as theism. Agnosticism, in my definition, anyway, dictates that one’s responsibility to self and to others can only be handled by taking all responsibility for one’s self. Thus, the issue of whether a God exists is not essential at all

Death, if it means the total end of one’s “spirit,” his memory, his experience, means only an end to the plagues of life – yes, and the pleasures, too. It will come, and the outcomes will come what may. If there is anything beyond death– which, of course, there is no evidence -- only hope by those who choose to believe. “Whatever will be, will be."

You may interpret this then that I am in truth a Believer inasmuch that I must assume that I can only account for my behavior to myself. Like any other human being, that is far from perfect. If there is a Supreme Being, that has to be enough for him – or her – or it. No rational thought permits any other ending. We would be ascribing human behavior to any God to be vengeful, demanding, condescending. We then should pray to ourselves to amend our behavior, to cease our indiscretions

That is responsibility.

The wish for something beyond the grave undoubtedly is strongly imprinted in all of mankind. I look at myself and laugh at it – and go on ”communicating” with a tiny cat who crawled up on my shoulder every night to give and receive warmth and affection before a veterinarian injected the poison that brought on a peaceful death to end her fading health

An earthquake kills thousands in China. A tsunami wipes out more thousands in Thailand. Shocked? We are that, but the pain of Tammy the cat’s death brings more sorrow.

And I still call the dog, Bo, who died at 14 late last year. He was always there, wherever I was. His affection was simple and enduring. Will he be there when we die? Will the dozens of other pets in my lifetime, as well as the uncles and the cousins whom one reckons up by dozens? If there are no ups and downs in an afterlife, wouldn’t it be the most miserable and boring “perfect” world? Hell is often spoken of with more affection and variety.

Let it be enough to know that we have seeded friends and spouses and children and their children to take up where we leave off, and that will be our legacy – our afterlife.

###

A Brother named Edward

My spouse had a brother named Edward. And, let me tell you, he was a brother who could make his way in this world quite successfully. He would have been have been 90 years old today, so in addition to writing this to the background of old hymns that I’m playing in his memory, I have a few other remarkable things to say about him:

Polite? That was a word for him. Why, when you’re having dinner and you’re passing the plate with a couple of fried chicken pieces remaining – one of which you particularly wish he wouldn’t pick – he would pass it on and say so graciously, “Thank you, but not at the present time.”

He was the best pet-sitter we ever had. He left his beloved Teddy to us when he passed on, and we could tell the moment we went to the bathroom how much attention he had in Edward’s care. That friendly cat seldom fails to come in for a petting when we’re settled in there. “There, Teddy, nice kitty, Teddy. Yes, we’ll pet you just as Edward must have done.”

And Edward was kind to the folks his sister got for him as caregivers in his late years. One of his caregivers returned the favors with equal kindness. Once we found that a gentleman caregiver had taken Edward to the bar with him.

Some of the caregivers marveled at Edward’s good taste in silver, jewelry, trinkets and other valuables. They helped themselves generously to these valuables he had saved, and we knew they were in, well, eager hands.

When Edward passed on, we had a memorial service at our house, which attracted everyone from his favorite Presbyterian pastor to his handyman, Dave. And do you know what? As the pastor paused before his final “amen,” the old clock on the wall, which seldom got wound up, struck a sonorous “GONG.” To close the service.

Did he love his sister? He was in his adolescent years when she arrived surprisingly on the scene;. Shortly afterward, their father died. Edward then took over the role of father to Barbara and indispensable helpmate to their mother even in the devastating era of economic depression over the land.

And he didn’t pass on until he thought he had done his last respect to Barbara. He died on her birthday – peacefully and undoubtedly aware that he had done all he could until it was all over.

Yes, Edward was quite a man. I am glad he lived and entered my life too. We try to mark his passing every year with a flower tossed into the waves of the ocean where his ashes were scattered.

We have only one budding rose coming on today, but it has arrived timely enough that it will serve for the simple ceremony.

Sleep well, Edward. ..

Paul, September 7, 2005

Saturday, June 04, 2005

Far from the Old Folks at Home

I'd just received an Email from the brother of perhaps my first friend outside the family. Lynn Dill was just a tot -- and I wasn't much bigger.His brother, Luverne, is long gone, but I remember the day as first graders in North Dakota, he and I trotted all the way across town -- it must have been all of a half mile from one side to the other-- with hopes of seeing Joyce Reynolds, a lovely little first grader, too.

Tired and worn, we got to the Reynolds home just in time to see the family pulling out of their driveway. Our long hike produced only a timid smile and a wave. And then we trudged all the way home.

Funny how memory snapshots last nearly 80 years, and I can't remember what we had for dinner last night.

Mugs rode the running board. . .

Our family stayed in Mott (pop. 1032, and dwindling) until Dad moved us all -- Mamma, my sister,two brohers and my dog, Mugs -- all the way to Albuquerque where my father knew a university was available. He culdn't have afforded to send us away to school and my oldest brother was just reaching enrollment age.

Dad was a rural mail carrier, and the mail had to go through come rain, thunder, or blizzard -- all of which came with regularity. He also was called away many a night to drive the only doctor in town to patients miles away on the snow-clogged prairie.

While others had to resort to horse-drawn sleighs, Dad built himself a snowmobile -- nothing like the slick little snow skimmers today. He took his Model T Ford, put iron skis on the front axle, while two rear axles had tractor tread like a tank out of the war. He constructed an asbestos-sided cab where he put in a little wood stove to defreeze his lunch.

I know because once he took my sister Lois and me on the 54-mile route on a bright but bitterly cold day. Our sandwiches were frozen solid, even though Dad had invented a heater for the car. We went on riding like a roller-coaster ride over the hills and valleys of snow.

The gas tank fell off . . .


Then the gas tank fell off the car. That's right. It took perhaps a minute for Dad to find the tank was gone. With what gas was left in the carburetor, he quickly U-turned, found the tank, remounted it, and away we go over the drifting snw.

A sack of coffee beans had broken open.We kids weren't allowed to drink coffee, but Dad let us feed on the beans. Patrons alomg the way were always nice to Dad and wouldn't mind if a few coffee beans were misssing from their mail.

Mugs, the dog, didn't ride the mail with us, but he rode in a box on the fender of our Chevrolet in the winter of 1933 on our way to New Mexico. How he survived the cold, I don't know. Alas, he didn't survive the streets of Albuquerque. He got hit on 'Central Avenue in front of the library. What a dog's life he had endured.

In today's Email from Lynn, he said they'd had to go to the cellar when the whistle atop the big water tank warned that twisters were crossing the prairie nearby. No one was hurt but the barn was smashed on George Hardmeyer's farm.

What could we do in California? I haven't seen a cellar in a home since I left New Mexico in 1945. Back in Mott, the Kokomos had one two doors and a vacant lot from our house. It was never used for any twisters in our days, but I remember how wonderfully cool it was -- sitting there with the fruit all canned for the winter, like squirrels do.

Cock - a - doodle - Doooooo!

Mrs. Kokomo's yard stirs other memories not so nostalgic. Sister Lois felt she couldn't emerge from our outdoor toilet, because a frisky little calf was straying around. As her manly little brother, I ran to the rescue and chased the calf down past the Kokomos.

Just then, a crowing rooster cockle-doodle-dooed over the coop fence and landed on my noggin. He tried to kill me, and he was well along in the process of trying to peck my head open. Mrs. Kokomo ran out and pulled the rooster off.

Later that day, Mrs. Kokomo invited me over, with my bandaged head, to see the rooster roasted and left on the back stoop to cool.

Two empty lots between the Kokomos and Grandma Batty's house served as a playground, a mock battlefield, a wild-onion patch, and everything else for kids.
It was time when endurance feats were popular. Lindbergh had flown the Atlantic.Flagpole sitters got their pictures in the paper. The neighborhood kids decided to see how long they could keep a kite in the air.

It took lots of preparation: Constructing the kite, getting the string needed, tying old rags on for a tail. Besides that, we put cots up, hauled blankets out, bottled water -- you name it. We were prepared to stay as long as the kite flew. . . days, maybe a week.

That's all I remember about it, except that we never got the kite into the air.

Oh, I could go on about North Dakota, but I don't want to overstay my welcome today, if you've reached this far. By the way, I'm upset because I understand visitors are only allowed "300 charactrs" to post comments.

That hardly gives you room to say, "Knock it off, Paul."



--